Petra Kelly (1947-1992) has remained recorded in history as one of the true icons of modern German and European environmental movement. Combining the ideas of feminism, peace, nonviolence, ecology (environmental protection) and social justice, she has managed to reconcile these seemingly opposing ideas and merge them into one specific type of ideology that was the guiding idea of the German Green Party until the mid-nineties of the last century. This is not the case of an eclectic kind of ideology, the simple merging of ideas into a single functional unit policy, but of an ideology that is based on the notion that the nuclear age, political, social, gender, class and other differences are something that inhibits humanity in its real progress. At the same time, Petra Kelly has shown that true feminism is not necessarily something that is obscure or something that is politically incorrect. Modern feminism, as it was propagated by Petra Kelly, in compliance with environmental political idea, the idea of peace, nonviolence, anti-nuclear policy and the idea of direct democracy, represents an ideology that, by its political radicalism and its strong criticism of the capitalist society, stands side by side with ecologism. "Cassandra of the nuclear apocalypse", "The Ulrike Meinhof of the eighties", in spite of all her accomplishments for the formation of the German Greens, unfortunately, remained forgotten in the political thought and political practice of the party
This article analyzes the environmental policy of the Republic of Serbia within the context of accession conditions to the European Union. The main challenges of environmental integration of the environmental policies of Serbia are: economic challenges, the sustainable development challenge, administrative challenges, democratic deficiency challenges, and political challenges. These challenges, while flaws of the environmental policy in Serbia, are no different than the challenges faced by other Central Eastern European countries during the accession process. However, the influence of the global economic crisis, the constant political crisis and unclear definition of the political scene in Serbia, an incomplete vision of environmental education, as well as too much "green" marketing activities and a lack of true law implementation, are additional factors that make the process of environmental accession of Serbia to the EU even more difficult. Therefore, the harmonization of the Serbian environmental legal frame with the European one must be followed by the harmonization of actions of political institutions, social groups and individual citizens, and the overall democratization of society. ; U članku se razmatra politika zaštite okoliša Republike Srbije u kontekstu uvjeta koje zahtijeva pristupanje Europskoj uniji. Glavni izazovi koji se odnose na integraciju politike zaštite okoliša u Srbiji su: izazovi vezani uz ekonomski i održivi razvoj; upravljački kapaciteti; slabosti u razvoju demokracije i politički izazovi. Spomenuti izazovi, premda opterećuju razvoj politike zaštite okoliša u Srbiji, nisu drukčiji od izazova s kojima su bile suočene druge zemlje Srednje Europe tijekom procesa pristupa EU-u. Utjecaj globalne ekonomske krize, konstantna politička kriza i nedefinirana politička scena u Srbiji, nedostatna vizija ekološkog obrazovanja, jednako kao i "prezelene" marketinške aktivnosti, te neuspjeh u implementaciji zakonodavstva predstavljaju, međutim, dodatne faktore koji proces pribibližavanja Srbije u području okoliša čine znatno otežanim. Stoga je radi harmonizacije legalnog okvira zaštite okoliša u Srbiji s europskim potrebno da spomenutu harmonizaciju slijedi harmonizacija djelovanja političkih institucija, društvenih skupina i individualnih građana te opća demokratizacija društva.
The paper analyzes the strategic documents that the Government Serbia adopted in the period from 2008 through 2011, from the point of the extent to which basic ideas and principles of sustainable development are present in those strategies. By adopting the National Strategy for Sustainable Development in 2008 the Republic of Serbia has accepted that sustainable development becomes its permanent development orientation and of course one of the prerequisites for entry into the family of modern European states. However, given the symbolist, traditional and declarative approach to the concept of sustainable development, it can be established that most the adopted strategic documents, that is, national strategies are not essentially, but only formally, in line with the National Strategy for Sustainable Development. The reasons are certainly found in the fact that the state, that is, the administrative structure, did not understand the essence of sustainable development and the opportunities it provides. Although the idea of sustainable development should be approached from a critical standpoint, there is no doubt that by its political ignorance in the politics of the Serbian government it loses the necessary and costly time needed to strengthen the process of modernization and ecologisation of the society in Serbia.
Environmental movements are continuing to demonstrate their relevance and innovative tendencies in the 21st century. Environmental problems are as yet unresolved in this century, the global environmental crisis exists, but the policies of green parties, which arose from environmental movements, have not yielded adequate results. The paper presents the origins of environmental movements as well as their separation from new social movements. In the context of this separation, the paper explores the stages of development of environmental movements from their inception to the present day and compares the activities of these movements, from protest to pacification and marginalization, through "corporate" eco-movements, to the creation of so-called communal eco communities which could figure as environmental movements in the future. Based on the development of environmental movements so far, their future in this century is considered, as well as new tendencies and trends. In this sense, the subject of analysis are movements such as the "Economy for the Common Good", which aims at not only environmental but also complete social transformation, and current and ad hoc movements such as "Extinction Rebellion" and "Fridays for Future". Special emphasis is placed on offshoots, such as "influencer ecologism", "celebrity ecologism" and "tabloid ecologism", that are presented as initiatives that could possibly create environmental movements in the future. ; Ekološki pokreti pokazuju svoju aktuelnost i inovativnost i u XXI veku, jer ekološki problemi i dalje postoje, kao i globalna ekološka kriza, a politika zelenih stranaka koje su nastale iz ekoloških pokreta nije dala odgovarajuće rezultate. U radu se izlažu uzroci nastanka ekoloških pokreta i njihovog izdvajanja iz novih društvenih pokreta. U kontekstu tog izdvajanja, rad se bavi istraživanjem faza razvoja ekoloških pokreta od nastanka do današnjih dana i upoređivanjem njihovih aktivnosti, od protesta do pacifikacije i marginalizacije, od "korporacijskih" eko-pokreta, do stvaranja takozvanih komunalnih ekoloških zajednica, koje u budućnosti mogu da figurišu kao ekološki pokreti. Na osnovu zakonitosti u dosadašnjem razvoju ekoloških pokreta promišlja se i njihova budućnost u ovom veku, kao i nove tendencije i trendovi. U tom smislu, predmet analize su pokreti poput Ekonomije opšte dobrobiti, čiji cilj nije samo ekološka već i potpuna društvena transformacija, ali i trenutno aktuelni i ad hoc pokreti poput Extinction Rebellion i Fridays for Future. Posebno su naglašene nuspojave, "influenserski ekologizam", "selebriti ekologizam" i "tabloidni ekologizam", koje se predstavljaju kao inicijativa koja može da rezultuje stvaranjem ekoloških pokreta u budućnosti.
Sustainable development has become one of the key elements in formulating and implementing development policies in the world. It can be defined as 'the development that meets present needs without endangering the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. In addition to that, it is a target-oriented, long-term, comprehensive political process that affects all aspects of life (economic, social, environmental, and institutional) at all levels. The concept of sustainable development implies the harmonization of economic, social, and environmental requirements. The goal of sustainable development strategies is to balance three key factors, as pillars of sustainable development: sustainable economic growth and economic and technological development, sustainable development of society based on social balance, and environmental protection with rational management of natural resources, combining them into a whole, supported by appropriate institutional framework. In this paper, there are two main aims: first, to describe the structural form and the basic characteristics of the national sustainable development strategies in Serbia, Montenegro and Croatia; second, to perform a comparative analysis of these three national sustainable development strategies and to provide a review of their similarities and differences. The comparison is based on three criteria: economic, social, and ecological. More specifically, for each of these three aspects (economic, social and environmental) five criteria are set, yielding fifteen key criteria for sustainable development on which the analysis is based. ; Održivi razvoj je postao jedan od ključnih elemenata u formulisanju i sprovođenju razvojnih politika u svetu. Definiše se kao 'razvoj koji izlazi u susret potrebama sadašnjice, a da ne ugrožava sposobnost budućih generacija da zadovolje svoje sopstvene potrebe', ali on je, osim toga, ciljno orijentisan, dugoročan, sveobuhvatan i politički proces koji utiče na sve aspekte života (ekonomski, socijalni, ekološki i institucionalni) na svim nivoima. Koncept održivog razvoja podrazumeva usaglašavanje ekonomskih, socijalnih i ekoloških zahteva. Cilj strategija održivog razvoja je da dovedu do ravnoteže tri ključna faktora, odnosno tri stuba održivog razvoja: održivog ekonomskog rasta i privrednog i tehnološkog razvoja, održivog razvoja društva na bazi socijalne ravnoteže, zaštite životne sredine uz racionalno raspolaganje prirodnim resursima, spajajući ih u jednu celinu podržanu odgovarajućim institucionalnim okvirom. U ovom radu postavljena su dva osnovna zadatka. Prvi, da se izlože strukturna forma i osnovne karakteristike nacionalnih strategija održivog razvoja Republika Srbije, Crne Gore i Hrvatske (u daljem tekstu NSOR Srbije, Crne Gore i Hrvatske); drugi, da se izvrši komparativna analiza nacionalnih strategija održivog razvoja navedene tri države i pruži pregled njihovih međusobnih identičnosti, sličnosti i razlika. Da bi se uspešno odgovorilo na ove zadatke definisana su tri osnovna kriterijuma komparacije: ekonomski, socijalni i ekološki. Preciznije rečeno, određeno je petnaest ključnih kriterijuma održivog razvoja, po pet iz svakog segmenta (ekonomski, socijalni i ekološki) na osnovu kojih je izvršena analiza ova tri nacionalna dokumenta. PR Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 179076: Politički identitet Srbije u Regionalnom i globalnom kontekstu.
Environmental policy is one of the new policies in the corpus of public policies in Serbia. Although the beginning of environmental policy in Serbia, or organized directing of society towards the environment, can be noticed even at the beginning of the nineties, the real development and intensification of this policy occurs only in the last five years. The slowness of the acceptance of the political idea that society and the state must change their attitude towards the environment is one of the causes of inefficiency of environmental policy in Serbia. This is also supported by the fact that in the process of conception and implementation of environmental policy in Serbia an essential element is missing that is reflected in the lack of sufficient democratic and political capacity. Environmental policy in Serbia is still defined and viewed as a strictly national policy, as a right and obligation of public authorities to protect the environment, while completely neglecting the role of other social institutions and especially the citizens. The lack of democracy in decision-making on environmental image of Serbia is also visible in the non-use of different models of direct democracy, and lack of objective and timely information of citizens about environmental problems in the country. In that way, the combination of impairment of democracy in decision-making, lack of information, as well as slowness of solving environmental problems and so-called 'black spots' in Serbia leads to the conclusion that the environmental policy of the Republic of Serbia, led by the state authorities, shows signs of a specific 'eco-monopolism' that is inappropriate in the democratic spirit of environmental policy. ; Ekološka politika je jedna od novijih politika u korpusu javnih politika u Srbiji. Iako početak ekološke politike u Srbiji, odnosno organizovanog usmeravanja društva prema životnoj sredini, možemo da uočimo još početkom devedesetih godina prošlog veka, pravi razvoj i intenziviranje ove politike nastaje tek u poslednjih pet godina. Sporost prihvatanja političke ideje da društvo i država moraju da menjaju svoj odnos prema životnoj sredini je jedan od uzroka neefikasnosti ekološke politike u Srbiji. Tome u prilog ide i činjenica da u procesu koncipiranja i ostvarivanja ekološke politike u Srbiji nedostaje bitan momenat koji se ogleda u nedostatku dovoljnog demokratskog i političkog kapaciteta. Ekološka politika se u Srbiji i dalje definiše i posmatra kao striktno državna politika, kao pravo i obaveza državnih organa da štite životnu sredinu, dok se u potpunosti zanemaruje uloga drugih društvenih institucija i pogotovo građana. Nedostatak demokratičnosti u odlučivanju o ekološkoj slici Srbije je takođe vidljiv u neprimenjivanju različitih modela neposredne demokratije, kao i nedostatku objektivne i pravovremene informisanosti građana o ekološkim problemima u zemlji. Na taj način, kombinacija nedemokratičnosti u odlučivanju, neinformisanosti, kao i sporosti u rešavanju ekoloških problema i takozvanih 'crnih tačaka' u Srbiji upućuju na zaključak da ekološka politika Republike Srbije, vođena od strane državnih organa, pokazuje znake specifičnog 'ekomonopolizma' neprimerenog demokratskom duhu ekološke politike.
The paper analyzes the strategic documents that the Government Serbia adopted in the period from 2008 through 2011, from the point of the extent to which basic ideas and principles of sustainable development are present in those strategies. By adopting the National Strategy for Sustainable Development in 2008 the Republic of Serbia has accepted that sustainable development becomes its permanent development orientation and of course one of the prerequisites for entry into the family of modern European states. However, given the symbolist, traditional and declarative approach to the concept of sustainable development, it can be established that most the adopted strategic documents, that is, national strategies are not essentially, but only formally, in line with the National Strategy for Sustainable Development. The reasons are certainly found in the fact that the state, that is, the administrative structure, did not understand the essence of sustainable development and the opportunities it provides. Although the idea of sustainable development should be approached from a critical standpoint, there is no doubt that by its political ignorance in the politics of the Serbian government it loses the necessary and costly time needed to strengthen the process of modernization and ecologisation of the society in Serbia. ; U radu se analiziraju strateški dokumenti koje je Vlada Republike Srbije usvojila u periodu od 2008. do 2011. godine, sa stanovišta u kojoj meri su u tim strategijama prisutne osnovne ideje i principi održivog razvoja. Usvajajući Nacionalnu strategiju održivog razvoja 2008. godine, Republika Srbija je prihvatila da održivi razvoj postane njeno trajno razvojno opredeljenje i, naravno, jedan od uslova za ulazak u porodicu savremenih evropskih država. Međutim, imajući u vidu simbolistički, tradicionalistički i deklarativni prilaz koncepciji održivog razvoja, može se utvrditi da većina usvojenih strateških dokumenata, odnosno nacionalnih strategija, nisu suštinski, već samo formalno usklađene sa Nacionalnom strategijom održivog razvoja. Razlozi tome se svakako nalaze u činjenici da državne, odnosno administrativne strukture nisu shvatile suštinu održivog razvoja i mogućnosti koje on pruža. Iako prema ideji održivog razvoja treba pristupati sa kritičkog stanovišta, nesumnjivo je da se njegovim političkim ignorisanjem u politici Vlade Srbije gubi neophodno i skupo vreme potrebno u jačanju procesa modernizacije i ekologizacije društva u Srbiji.
The paper shows a short review of the development of the ecology and other environmental (ecological) sciences. From general ecology that is understood as a natural science to social ecology as one of sub disciplines of sociology. Complication of political relations and environmental problems in society of 20th and 21st century inevitably caused social and scientific need for these complex relations between society and nature to be explored within a new scientific discipline - a political ecology. The paper also shows the scientific dilemmas, different views, opinions and definitions that concern the subjects of studies of political ecology and its position in the wider system of sciences. One of the basic questions is if the political ecology is one of the disciplines of political economy, geography and political anthropology or it is a political discipline. The Author believes that it is possible to define political ecology as a discipline of politicology which subject is the influence of politics, political ideologies, political phenomena, political relations, institutions and other subjects of political life to the way society relates to environment and how specific and non specific environmental problems influence and change politics. ; U radu se izlaže kratak pregled razvoja ekologije i drugih ekoloških nauka. Od opšte ekologije, shvaćene kao prirodne nauke, do socijalne ekologije, kao jedne od poddisciplina sociologije. Usložnjavanje političkih odnosa i ekoloških problema u društvu XX i XXI veka neminovno je dovelo do društvene i naučne potrebe da se ovi kompleksni odnosi između društva i prirode istraže u okviru jedne nove naučne discipline - političke ekologije. U radu se takođe izlažu i naučne nedoumice, različiti stavovi, mišljenja i definicije, koje se odnose na pitanja predmeta proučavanja političke ekologije i njenog mesta u širem sistemu nauka. Jedno od osnovnih pitanja jeste da li je politička ekologija jedna od disciplina političke ekonomije, geografije i političke antropologije ili je u pitanju politikološka disciplina. Autor stoji na stanovištu da je moguće političku ekologiju definisati kao disciplinu politikologije koja za predmet svog proučavanja ima uticaj politike, političkih ideologija, političkih pojava, političkih odnosa, institucija, i drugih subjekata političkog života na odnos društva prema životnoj sredini i kako specifični i nespecifični ekološki problemi utiču i menjaju politiku.
Ecological modernization theory has been developing for more than two decades so that today, it has became one of the leading social - ecological theories of industrial environment and environment transformation. One of the characteristics of the ecological modernization theory is an effort to explain institutional transformation in the modern society and environment. Those transformations are related to the internalization of the new systems of economic, political, social and ethics values and interests of the civilization to preserve the environment under the conditions of globalization. The ecological modernization theory proposes that the politics of economic development and environmental politics can have the same or similar goals, which are manifested in strict implementation of environmental politics that would, as such, have positive influence on economic development and processes of technological innovation. At the same time, this theory which is synchronized with the process of the globalization shows tendencies of antiglobalization by localizing environmental movements. . ; Teorija ekološke modernizacije se razvija više od jedne decenije da bi danas postala jedna od vodećih socio-ekoloških teorija transformacije industrijske sredine i životne sredine. Jedna od karakteristika teorija ekološke modernizacije nalazi se u pokušaju da se objasne institucionalne promene u savremenom društvu i životnoj sredini. Te promene su povezane sa internacionalizacijom novih sistema ekonomskih, političkih, socijalnih i etičkih vrednosti i interesima civilizacije za očuvanjem životne sredine u uslovima globalizacije. Teorija ekološke modernizacije sugeriše da politika ekonomskog razvoja i ekološka politika mogu da imaju iste ili slične ciljeve, koji se manifestuju strogom primenom ekološke politike koja bi kao takva imala pozitivan uticaj na ekonomski razvoj i procese tehnoloških inovacija. U isto vreme, ova teorija koja je usklađena sa procesima globalizacije, pokazuje i tendencije anti-globalizacije koji se manifestuju ...
Ecological modernization theory has been developing for more than two decades so that today, it has became one of the leading social - ecological theories of industrial environment and environment transformation. One of the characteristics of the ecological modernization theory is an effort to explain institutional transformation in the modern society and environment. Those transformations are related to the internalization of the new systems of economic, political, social and ethics values and interests of the civilization to preserve the environment under the conditions of globalization. The ecological modernization theory proposes that the politics of economic development and environmental politics can have the same or similar goals, which are manifested in strict implementation of environmental politics that would, as such, have positive influence on economic development and processes of technological innovation. ; Teorija ekološke modernizacije se razvija više od dve decenije da bi danas postala jedna od vodećih socio-ekoloških teorija transformacije industrijske i životne sredine. Jedna od karakteristika teorija ekološke modernizacije nalazi se u pokušaju da se objasne institucionalne promene u savremenom društvu i životnoj sredini. Te promene su povezane sa internacionalizacijom novih sistema ekonomskih, političkih, socijalnih i etičkih vrednosti i interesima civilizacije za očuvanjem životne sredine u uslovima globalizacije. Teorija ekološke modernizacije sugeriše da politika ekonomskog razvoja i ekološka politika mogu da imaju iste ili slične ciljeve, koji se manifestuju strogom primenom ekološke politike koja bi kao takva imala pozitivan uticaj na ekonomski razvoj i procese tehnoloških inovacija.
The precautionary principle is one of the most controversial principles of the contemporary environmental policy. Theoretical determination and practical use of this principle is stipulated by science which has to control and gives direction to the society to be less risky for present and future generations by its arguments. Domination of science in theoretical and practical determination of the precaution principle is at the same time limited by a current roles of politics and economy in modern societies. In practice the precaution principle shows the power ration among politics, science, society and environment. This work is dealing in analysis of political and economical controversis which arise from application or non application of this principle in solving environmental and social problems on national and international level. Accordingly, the subject of analysis is a conflict of standpoints and arguments of its supporters and opposers, their identification and real interests behind their beliefs. The work presents a case study of BSE or 'mad cow desease' as an example of applying the precaution principle. . ; Princip predostrožnosti je jedan od najkontroverznijih principa savremene ekološke politike. Teorijsko određenje i praktična primena ovog principa uslovljena je ulogom nauke koja treba da svojim dokazima kontroliše i usmerava društvo u pravcu koje će biti manje rizično za sadašnje i buduće generacije. Dominantnost koju nauka ima u teorijskom i praktičnom određenju principa predostrožnosti je ujedno i ograničena ulogom koju politika i ekonomija trenutno imaju u savremenim društvima. U praksi princip predostrožnosti pokazuje koji je odnos snaga između politike, nauke, društva i životne sredine. Rad se bavi analizom političkih i ekonomskih kontroverzi koje proizilaze iz primene ili neprimene ovog principa u rešavanju ekoloških i društvenih problema na nacionalnom i međunarodnom nivou. U tom smislu, predmet analize jeste sukob stavova i argumenata pristalica i protivnika ovog principa, njihova identifikacija i stvarni interesi koji iza njih stoje. U radu je kao primer primene principa predostrožnosti izložena studija slučaja BSE ili 'bolesti ludih krava'. .
In this work the author analyses ideological fundamentals European Green parties originated from, as well as the principles upon they based their political ideology. Specially stressed are the post materialistic values as an important cause of the Green parties development from environmental movements. In the same context, the following political principles of these parties are considered: ecology, peace, nonviolence, grassroots democracy justice, multicultural democracy, sustainable development, etc. The author defines the Green parties ideology as a group of values and practice, that is, as a homogeneous, consistent, holistic and hegemonistis ideology which includes all significant social problems of the contemporary industrial civilization. ; Autor u radu analizira ideološke korene nastanka partija Zelenih u Evropi kao i principe na kojima se zasniva njihova politička ideologija. Poseban naglasak je dat na postmaterijalističkim vrednostima kao važnom uzroku nastanka partija Zelenih iz ekoloških pokreta. U tom kontekstu razmatraju se i politički principi ovih partija kao što su: ekologija, mir, nenasilje neposredna demokratija, pravda, multikulturna demokratija, održivi razvoj itd. Autor ideologiju partija Zelenih definiše kao skup vrednosti i prakse odnosno kao homogenu, konzistentnu, holističku i hegemonističku ideologiju kojom su obuhvaćeni svi važni društveni problemi savremene industrijske civilizacije.
Societies - both the individual states and the international community, alliances and the relationships they are based on. From the important issue in the function of developing possibilities, economic, military and technological power of a country, the issue of energy supply politics is turning today into a complex calculation of necessities and limitations. Energy sources are limited and impossible to restore while the demand for them is constantly increasing because the functioning of modern economies cannot be imagined without them. Under the conditions of globalized industry and world economic flows, particularly commerce, constant and safe energy production is also the matter of international prestige. This paper analyzes the political relationships and controversies which determine the creation of strategies of national and global energetic safety at the example of the United States of America, Venezuela and the Russian Federation. ; Politika u oblasti energetike spada u red strateških pitanja savremenih društava - kako pojedinačnih država, tako i međunarodne zajednice, saveza i odnosa na kojima počiva. Kao jedno od značajnih pitanja u funkciji razvojnih mogućnosti, privredne, ekonomske, vojne i tehnološke moći jedne zemlje, pitanje energetske politike danas se sve više pretvara u složenu kalkulaciju nužnosti i ograničenja. Resursi energenata su ograničeni i neobnovljivi, a potražnja za njima je u stalnom porastu jer je funkcionisanje modernih ekonomija bez njih nezamislivo. U uslovima globalizovane industrije i svetskih ekonomskih tokova, posebno trgovine, neprestana i sigurna proizvodnja energije pitanje je i međunarodnog prestiža. U radu se analiziraju politički odnosi i kontroverze, koji determinišu kreiranje strategija nacionalne i globalne energetske bezbednosti, na primerima Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, Venecuele i Ruske Federacije.
There is neither adequately developed environment consciousness nor adequate representation of suitable orientations regarding this question among prominent parliamentary parties in Serbia. Relatively, when it does exist, the need for profit and economic development if regularly put in the first place, with the exception of SPS, which regularly insists on the politics of sustainable development. In this sense, Serbia is not an exemption regarding the other countries in transition. Unfortunately, regression is noticeable with some parties (DS) regarding this question - in sense that it is not mentioned any more in party documents, although it used to have a significant place in their older orientational documents. Other greater parliamentary parties are oriented to the sustainable development, some of them very comprehensively and universally (DSS, LDP in its Manifesto), some only by principle (G17+) and implicitly (SRS, SNS, PUPS), while some of them, like JS and NS do not mention at all in their programs the question of environment protection, while some treat environment only as the source of profit (SPO). Simultaneously, the parties oriented to the politics of sustainable development have no power to point out the specific problems with which our country has confronted after the NATO aggression and bombardment with at least 9 tons of depleted uranium. Out of parliament Green environmental party - the GREEN from Novi Pazar is the only party pronouncing clearly and socially responsible on this question. The other environmental party - the Green of Serbia has an outstanding globalistic attitude, pleading for sustainable development and non-violence, but with avoiding such concretization. ; U radu se vrši analiza sadržaja osnovnih programskih dokumenata najvećih parlamentarnih partija i jedine dve registrovane partije 'zelenih' u Srbiji sa stanovišta njihovog (ne)opredeljivanja za politiku održivog razvoja. Primenjen je, gde je to bilo moguće, hronološki pristup: kako su se menjali stavovi partija po ovom pitanju u 20-godišnjem periodu od reuspostavljanja višestranačja u Srbiji.
The paper analyzes the basic concepts, approaches, objectives and individual tasks of the National strategy for sustainable development in Serbia. These goals and objectives are viewed in the context of the lack of adequate political, administrative capacity and democratic deficit. These restrictions are the result of ignoring environmental problems and sustainable development as a political problem and issues of survival and social development. Therefore, the question of achieving sustainable development strategy in this paper and presented as a problem of formalization one of the possible conditions for the admission of Serbia into the European Union. This process of formalization is just visible through the slow process of realizing this strategy, lack of interest subjects of political life for the process and inadequate media coverage. High goals, thereby fully harmonized with the existing economic capacities, and general social awareness of the urgency and importance of sustainable development define this strategy not as a political vision but as a kind of political utopia. ; U radu se analiziraju osnovne koncepcije, pristupi, ciljevi i pojedinačni zadaci Nacionalne strategije održivog razvoja u Republici Srbiji. Ovi ciljevi i zadaci se posmatraju u kontekstu nedostatka adekvatnog političkog, administrativnog kapaciteta i demokratskog deficita. Ova ograničenja su rezultat ignorisanja ekoloških problema i održivog razvoja kao političkog problema i pitanja opstanka ekonomskog i socijalnog razvoja. Zato je pitanje ostvarivanja strategije održivog razvoja u ovom radu i postavljeno kao problem formalizovanja jednog od mogućih uslova za prijem Srbije u Evropsku uniju. Taj proces formalizacije je vidljiv upravo kroz proces sporog ostvarivanja ove strategije, nezainteresovanosti subjekata političkog života za taj proces i neadekvatne medijske podrške. Visoko postavljeni ciljevi, pri tome potpuno neusklađeni sa postojećim ekonomskim kapacitetima i opšte društvenom svešću o urgentnosti i značaju održivog razvoja, definišu ovu strategiju ne kao političku viziju već kao svojevrsnu političku utopiju.
